Description

Reflection Question for this Week: Haraway says “the machine is us, our processes, an aspect of our embodiment.” (p. 99) So, if we are heavily living in a social reality of gender social constructions doesn’t that mean our technology will ultimately have those too? Do we have to change so that our technology changes or can a technology that is aimed at going beyond gender or being genderless change us first?  Offer your position and support it. 

  • Related links:
  1. You are a cyborg: https://www.wired.com/1997/02/ffharaway/
  2. Feminist Cyborg Scholar Donna Haraway: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/20/donna-haraway-interview-cyborg-manifesto-post-truth
  3. Chela Sandoval: https://globalsocialtheory.org/thinkers/sandoval-chela/
  4. Monique Wittig: https://feminisminindia.com/2019/06/18/monique-wittig-material-feminism/
  5. Cyborg Feminism & transhumanism: https://youtu.be/Mh1WBj2YAgA

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here